Articles read on sites like the Washington Post now instantly (and automatically) but distributed with fellow Facebook users in the network and the debate is whether this violates the privacy of individuals by the intercepted articles they read.

Facebook Leads the social networking space, where space is in competition with Google.

Since the Facebook Open Graph was released on their developer conference f8, users are reading the ndjenën perhaps the weakness that their movements are being spied on Facebook. As an example, once a user adds an application to the Washington Post, every item that he / she reads will be posted in the news section on the walls of his companions / her.

The question arises, a user would like others to know that the world is knowing their daily movements?

Secondly, the Open Graph creates an overload of information, users overcrowded walls, often with unnecessary posts that they do not want to read. While this phenomenon is still limited to music and items, companies are more than happy to know that ii their material has more than 800 million users on the basis of the Facebook network. The more things that publish these enterprises in an effort to achieve more visits, the harassment comes as users increase.

Users have a choice

All users have the choice of allowing or not allowing the distribution of articles / posts to read from them. The fact that users have the final decision on deployment to distribute things in their profiles is crucial responsibility of users.